Location # 3: City Hall, Independence Hall, Art Museum

In order to properly choose three Philadelphia buildings that are worthy of glorifying the city of Philadelphia, I had to first think of characteristic that make the city unique to any other city.  In my opinion this city will always be known for its rich history and great artistic culture.  That is the reason I chose to use City Hall building, Independence Hall, and the Philadelphia Art Museum to glorify this city.  I chose to use City Hall and Philadelphia Art Museum because they both contain art work that connects the city back to the artistic roots that developed in its early history.  I used Independence Hall because it provokes the pride of being part of the foundation of the United States.

The first of the three buildings to be built is Independence Hall completed in 1753.   Edmund Woolley was the main architect and planner of this 21 year project.  Independence Hall is currently located at 520 Chestnut Street in Philadelphia.  The original purpose of this building was to be used to hold government and public events.  Most famously, Independence Hall was used as the location for the signing of the Declaration of Independence in 1776.  It is currently used as a historical landmark for tourism and is also the home of the Liberty Bell.  This building was originally constructed to be a symbol “of the nation to come” (UShistory).  Woolley designed this building with a Georgian style.  This was a popular style in the mid to late 1700’s (Britanica).   Since its completion Independence Hall had been renovated twice.  The first renovation was done by Greek revival architect John Haviland in 1830.  Then it was redone to resemble its original form in 1950 by the National Park Service.  Independence Hall was used in the making of the film National Treasures.   In this movie it served as a location that held a secret for early mason treasure.  In this film Independence Hall was used to symbolize a location that still has so much historic value.

Chronologically, Philadelphia’s City Hall was erected next 1901.  This building was designed by architect John McArthur Jr. and after completion it stood over 511 feet in height.  City Hall was originally commissioned to be the tallest structure in the world, but the Eiffel tower was completed and took that title.  Its original and current purpose is to serve as the home for all of Philadelphia’s government.  John McArthur Jr. designed City Hall with a second empire style of architecture (NEarchitecture).  Also known as Napoleon III style, this style of architecture was very popular during the latter half of the 19th century.  This style had characteristics that included a large freestanding building with square planned rooms (Britanica).  City Hall was used in the movie Law Abiding Citizens.  In this movie City Hall was used as a symbol of symbol of justice that directly interacted with the characters.

Lastly, The Philadelphia Art Museum was built in 1876 by architects Horace Trumbauer and Julian Abele.  The building was originally constructed to be an exhibition for the Centennial celebration in Memorial Hall at Fairmount Park.  The exhibition quickly outgrew its location and in was rebuilt at 2600 Benjamin Franklin Parkway Philadelphia, PA in 1928 .  Today it serves as a museum that holds over 220,000 famous art pieces collected from all around the world (PhilaMuseum).  Trumbauer and Abele designed the museum with a style of architecture called Greek revival.  This style is based on ancient Greek Temples.  Greek revival style was very popular in the beginning of the 19th century because it was a tribute to a period in history that symbolized wealth and intellectual advancement.  Most Greek revival styled building all has similar characteristics.  Some traits that were widely used in this style include the large columns and the use of marble or stone (Britanica). The Philadelphia Art Museum is no different the building is made up of what looks like three Ancient Greek temples that have Ionic sea style scrolled columns that tower the entrances. The Philadelphia Art Museum is an iconic location because it was featured in the Philadelphia based film RockyIn Rocky, the museum was used as background location.  The location was uniquely used in

the film because it was used as a vantage point that overlooked Philadelphia Skyline.  When the Rocky Statue was erected in 1982 on the top of the museum steps it drew controversy from the art community.  Some believed that the statue was a movie prop and degraded all of the artwork that was inside the museum.

City Hall, Independence hall and Philadelphia Art Museum are great examples for glorifying Philadelphia because they all provoke a sense of pride by its audience for the city.  I chose these three sites because they all represent a form of classic architecture in a modern world.  Although these buildings conflict with the urban and modern landscape of the city, they still are important because the classical architecture is used to pay tribute to the past.

 

City Hall

 

Independence Hall

Philadelphia Art Museum

 

Location #2: The ‘Clothespin’

P700046B

(Image of William Penn in the middle of the ‘Clothespin’)

Claes Oldenburg is known for making public art that draws a lot of controversial conversations.  That is why choosing to blow up the ‘Clothespin’ was a simple choice for me.  The ‘Clothespin’ was installed at Center Square at 15th and Market street in Philadelphia, Pa on June 25th, 1976.  When erected in 1976, the forty-foot, ten ton stainless steel structure brought a shocking image to the area.  An image that most people back in the day would have consider modernity because of its sheer size and uniqueness.  Due to its massive size, the sculpture has never been removed or relocated.

P700040B

(view of William Penn on top of ‘Clothespin’)

When asked about the meaning of the ‘Clothespin’, Claes Oldenburg claimed that his sculpture was not about the literal image of the ‘Clothespin’, rather he wanted to create a new image that showed off the use of form and structure of art.  Oldenburg thought that the ‘Clothespin’ was a perfect fit for a Philadelphia location because of three coincidences that the piece has.  The first coincidence he pointed out was the steel clips that binds the two halves forms into the number “76”, which was perfect since the installation date coincided with the celebration of the bicentennial year.  Secondly, Oldenburg claimed that the sculpture reminded him of the famous Brancusi’s piece ‘The Kiss’, which is located at the Philadelphia art museum.  His third and final coincidence, was that he believes the ‘Clothespin’ is identical to the Liberty Bell.  He says, “look at the sides, they are identical. They both have a crack down the center” (Forman).  Other artist and critics have mixed reviews on the ‘Clothespin’.  One art critic, Victoria Donohoe, that wrote for Philadelphia Inquirer in 1976, had some negative things to say about the structure.  She describes his work as being “humorously inappropriate”.  She also claims that the only ingredient lacking in the ‘Clothespin” is its social importance.  Donohoe had some harsh opinions, but she does recognize that Oldenburg was changing the way public art was being made.  A positive comment she wrote was that she enjoyed that he was still able to comment on a traditional symbol of “housewifery” in a unique way (Donohoe).  The Community was much more divided in their opinions.  There were some that absolutely hated the structure and some who thought that Oldenburg’s work was brilliant.  For example, in  “Art-by any other name”, an article in the Philadelphia Inquirer written in 1976, it quotes some spectators with opposite views.  The article quotes Albert Seltzer, a medical doctor in Philadelphia, saying that the ‘Clothespin is “excellent in its simplicity” and that Oldenburg should be “congratulated for bringing the excellent addition to Philadelphia” (Seltzer).  The article also has quotes from another spectator, James Martin, he believes that the art work is a “waste of tax payers money” and is “junky art” (Martin).  The best example of difference of opinions comes from Julie Liedman’s article “Stares, Glares, Disgust” (1976).  In this article she interviews Robert Goldstein, a repair man from SEPTA, and Joan Haas, a local college art student.  Goldstein had negative opinions:

Mechanic Calls

(clipping from “Stares, Glares, Disgust” J. Liedman, Philadelphia Inquirer)

Goldstein had negative criticism because he only views the sculpture as a rusty statue that tax payers paid for.  He believed that money could have been better used to feed or entertain the unfortunate (Liedman).   Haas had a more artistic view and was able to see past its mere image and says:

Mechanic Calls joan

(clipping from “Stares, Glares, Disgust” J. Liedman, Philadelphia Inquirer)

Haas is able to find enjoyment in that it is an object that everyone can identify with.  She also mentions in the article that she enjoyed Oldenburg’s ability to demonstrate form and structure with simple every day objects.  Compared to other public art works used in film, the ‘Clothespin is not as inspiration as the ‘Rocky’ Statue or as historic as the ‘Trevi Fountain’.  Public art like the ‘Rocky’ and the ‘Trevi Fountain’ are used to provoke emotion.  The ‘Rocky’ statue is used to create an emotion of inspiration and pride.  The ‘Trevi Fountain’ is used to create a romantic type emotion.  The ‘Clothespin’, however, fails to trigger any emotion.  It is used to be a symbol of the new type of art form that was created by Oldenburg.  In my opinion the ‘Clothespin’  holds very little value for the everyday person.   For the average person it merely serves as a mask for what would have been empty space.  I believe that its sole purpose for being commissioned  was to drive the illusion that Philadelphia is still a center of art.  Although I understand the Oldenburg’s symbolic and artistic meaning behind the sculpture, I still would like to blow it up because public funds paid for a sculpture that does not produce any human happiness or emotion.  In 2013, I believe that the shock factor has worn out.  It has become almost boring and unnoticeable to every day pedestrians.  Personally, I like art that I can connect to immediately and a piece of art that can produce a certain emotion.  For example, the ‘Rocky’ Statue is immediately recognizable and its symbolic value provokes an emotion of pride for the city I live in.

Untitled

P700045B

(Image of the ‘Clothespin’ with people for scale)

Untitled

(The ‘Clothespin’ today)

Works Cited
Donohoe, Victoria. “Oldenburg’s ‘Clothespin’: The Creation of a Public Art.” Philadelphia Inquirer [Philadelphia] 2 July 1976: n. pag. Print.
Forman, Nessa. “‘Clothespin’ a Triumph.” Philadelphia Inquirer [Philadelphia] 04 July 1976: n. pag. Print.
Liedman, Julie. “Stares, Glares, Disgust.” Philadelphia Inquirer [Philadelphia] 28 Nov. 1976: n. pag. Print.
Seltzer, Albert P., and James Martin. “Art-by Any Other Name.” Philadelphia Inquirer [Philadelphia] 7 July 1976: n. pag. Print.

Location #1: The Midway Theater

For location one, a Philadelphia movie theatre, I chose to research the grand Midway Theatre.  This theatre was built on December 24 1932 by the firm Magaziner, Eberhard and Harris for Sam Shapiro.

(Above advertising of Midway Theatre)

This elegant theatre was built on Allegheny Avenue near Kensington Avenue.  The designers of this theatre chose to use a Art-Deco Style which was very popular during this era.  The Art-Deco style is defined by its expressive use of colours as well as its bold geometric shapes.  The Midway featured this style with a large vertical sign that was very visible from many blocks.  The vertical sign sat on top of multicoloured circular marquees that made its appearance stand out.

(Above, close up of the Art-Deco style exterior architecture of the Midway Theatre)

The Midway Theatre was very large.  It had two types of seating lower level and balcony.  In total the theatre had a maximum capacity of about 2,700 seats.  The building also housed many other amenities some included:  offices, stores and restaurants.  This theatre was considered a second run theatre.  A second run theatre implies that this theatre never showed and premiers or openers.  It showed films that were already opened in center city.

(view from stage)

Standing on the balcony of the Midway Theater.

(view from the back)

(view from the upper balcony)

The Midway was wildly popular because it was the largest theater outside of center city.  Some believed that the Midway was the last grand building of the motion-picture palace era in Philadelphia.  According to some first hand accounts via blogs, some of the movies screened at this theater included: Marry Poppins(1964), 7 Faces of Dr. Loa (1964), and The Last of Sheila (1973).

The Midway was torn down in 1979 due to a movement for a rock and roll venue.  Instead it was replaced by a Burger King Franchise that was eventually closed down.  Today the site  is pretty nice area with Walgreen’s and Dunkin’ Doughnuts located on it,  but it will never be revered as it was when the Midway was standing.

Sources

http://cinematreasures.org/theaters/9172

http://www.phillyhistory.org/blog/index.php/2011/06/neighborhood-movie-theaters/

http://www.phillyneighbors.com/Remember%20when/Midway%20Theater/index.html